Living As A Sovereign

By James on November 20, 2013 in Sovereign
0
0

Normal
0

false
false
false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

st1:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

 

Facts of Mans Law Under ELOHIMS Law.

None of the this information on sites put out by the various government agencies talk about the facts of law in there own system that anyone can expatriate out of the US systems and repatriate back into any other nation or system they choose. This means to be Sovereign in any way you choose weather it be a member of another Sovereign nation or just a free man/woman in your own right. If they do not recognize the other system or the fact that someone is bidding that system of corruption goodbye then they are the ones that are not honoring our Elohim given unalienable right of free will to do as one pleases.

 

It is their heads on the block against ELOHIMS LAWS. Mans laws are not authorized by Elohim in any way shape or form. Go to this address and read what has been told about the first contact from a source not of this world that will be here soon and then the dung will hit the fan for all the control deceit and force that is in place now on earth that ELOHIM did not create or authorize for man to live under. http://www.discharge-debt.com/id139.htm

 

Do you think all the issues we face today were written on the 10 commandments? NO absolutely not. We are free men and women, if we do not like the system we can leave it at any time for any reason and that is even written in the constitution of the United States. Almost no one knows this but the Constitution was written by some very spiritual men. Most of which either were members of the free masons or practiced some form of spiritual beliefs that were other than that of the churches of the time. I have personally heard the higher realms state that they had a great deal to do with the writing of the Constitution through the hands of the human writers at the time of planning and writing the Constitution.

 

Their intent was to make this country free and the inhabitants of the country free as well by limiting the powers of government and the lawmakers. They knew very well from experience that even a little power corrupts the minds of most men. This is very evident today in the way we see so many paying a fine or going to jail for a wide variety of reasons from taxes to spitting on the sidewalk to just traveling down the road at a pace faster than one man (A COP) determined that he shouldn’t. WHY is this so? Because the system has successfully circumvented the Constitution and thrown it out completely form the legal systems.

 

They operate under contract law only. For you to be subject to this contract law you only need to be ignorant of the system and how it operates. When you accept anything from the state or federal government you fall into an invisible contract where they assume you to be subject to their codes. However, these codes are nothing more than a dress code just like at any employer.

 

When you are not an employee of that company you do not have to follow the dress code for any reason. The truth is setting us all free from the oppression and control they wish to impose on us against our free will rights given to us by ELOHIM.  Elohim has never given them any special power or authority to judge anyone except themselves. Free Will Look it up here: http://www.discharge-debt.com/id145.htm

 

You have to remember that they (the system) have tricked us all at birth by requiring a birth certificate, which is a contract in secrecy, which is by their own laws illegal to do under UCC codes. You and I live in a world of fear and deceit in such a wide range of forms that it is hard to see the forest thru the trees. We are deep in the middle of it and are fighting to get out.

 

 

 

That system does not want you to escape because you are worth millions to them under all the contracts they have sold against your STRAWMAN name. If you get out, they loose money.  Think about things in that light, and remember the disinformation will seem as though they have control and that what they say is the only way things can be.  Whenever someone brings up the constitution in court they are either shot down or even jailed for doing so, WHY, because they do not operate under the original constitution at all, they operate in commerce law and maritime laws that are the laws of the sea, which are laws transferred here from England and the monarch of the British Crown.

 

When you tell the courts that you stand in the kingdom of ELOHIM and under ELOHIMS laws only they will try to trick you but if you hold firm along with the fact that they have no jurisdiction over you the living man, who is the fiduciary for the fictional character that they created you will be set free 95% of the time by them dismissing the case. The other 5% is where they trick you into them assuming they actually have jurisdiction over you by saying something that deals with their offer of contract against the fictional character. YOU NEVER say anything about the case in a courtroom.

 

Since we are all created equal and with a mind of our own to think and decide for ourselves what is best for each one of us, we can be self-governed at all times. As you read from the free will article listed above no one can force there will upon you if it clashes with your choices, that is ELOHIMS law of it, and there is no altering that law by man.

 

There will be a time in the very short future where it is said that a FIRST CONTACT will be initiated from space by several groups that will aid us in restoring our rights and eliminating those that are so deeply into the control of other men and woman. These groups will be either removing those, that can’t see the light or they will retrain their minds to begin to see that free will is an equal thing and that they have never been given any special abilities to judge others as they please. I understand the likelihood is to just remove them from the planet so the rest of us can relax and live under ELOHIMS law and continue our intended path of evolution into the new millennium.

 

The system will argue with you and even try to jail you if you take the law into your own hands. NOW if we are all equal and free will then who says they can take the law into their hands, who says they can take ELOHIMS law into their hands and then alter it to suit their desires and then force that upon anyone that disagrees with that law that was then actually made up by them. You see it is all quite simple if we are all equal then they can no more make laws to control us than we can make laws to control them or to control ELOHIM for that matter.

 

When we look at the animal kingdom, we see the animals living in symmetry with each other in terms of control. They do not force anything on each other or upon other species of animals. They all live in the same world and many in the same territory without any such force of control. The do however take from the other animals the food they require to exist but that is the nature of survival that was planned by Elohim in order to maintain existence. Our ways are not so because we can make decisions based on a rational way of thinking, which many animals lack.


WAKE UP PEOPLE AND START USING YOUR ELOHIM GIVEN RIGHTS AND ABILITIES AND YOU WILL BE FREE FROM THE CORRUPTION OF THE LEGAL AND GOVERNING SYSTEMS. THE SOONER WE START TO THINK IN THIS WAY THE SOONER WE WILL GET THE HELP FROM SPACE.

They are waiting for the consciousness of earth to be wide spread enough and at the right level of understanding where we no longer accept the control of the dark ones that have infiltrated the minds of the week and corrupt.

 

Those men are the Law Makers and politicians and also the cops/public servants of all different agencies that do what their superiors tell them without question. This will happen without fail but the time frame is up to us.

 

Would you rather see this now in your lifetime?

Or maybe you would rather wait for your children to do it in their lifetime?

 

I for one want it now.

 

It appears that I am one of the many that I have been assigned the task of teaching others of their proper place in the grand scheme of things as is decreed by the higher realms of ELOHIM.

Without Prejudice

Chapter 4: Thee Sovereign Exemption

My personal Sovereign and Savior is Yahuah-Shua Christ. There is no other. The only direction I am to take is Covenant of Truth. The Bill of Rights at 1st Amendment and Thee Bible are my direction and standard for competent counsel.

A Sovereign Citizen cannot be punished for sincerely held religious convictions, U.S. v. Cheek.

Biblical Law at “Common Law” supersedes all laws, and “Christianity is custom, custom is Law.” Robin v. Hardaway 1790.

Elohim created man and has Sovereign Rights to our works. When man creates a “thing” it becomes property and distributed to other men in truthful dealings. Agency has “made liable” the people at contract with diverse weights and sustains promise with a “signing”.

The administrative record will show the “master” with whom we Covenant. This beguile is achieved by an unrevealed “benefit” and is unlawful to Covenant of Elohim. Many have not read Thee Constitution of These united States. Do not take my word for this but, Thee New Covenant is witness to Thee Bill of Rights and Article III.

 

 

Churches marry the people to the State and pledge the congregation by filing a Corp. 501-c(3). The Bible is declared the true word of Elohim in Public Law 97-280.

I do not see the benefit of two people marring in the eyes of the State. State then covets control of our children, and “educates” them without knowledge of Elohim. For what “benefit” to Thee sheep, when the wolf is stalking? Beguiled “artificial” “persons” must “create” other artificial persons or the Beast will die. Contracts We Thee People sign “unconditionally” every day are the administrative records way of telling us that we are not sovereign, the State is sovereign. Agency has far more of us sheep than they deserve. Elohim is looking yet for His Creative Man to step forward with His Staff of Law.

Matthew 17:24, Yahuah-Shua and the disciples were at Capernaum. The tax collectors came to Peter, and ask him if Yahuah-Shua paid the tax. Peter spoke by design in saying, yes. Yahuah-Shua asks Simon, if the King’s children pay the tax or do strangers give tribute. Peter advised Yahuah-Shua that strangers paid the tax, and Caesar’s children did not. Yahuah-Shua said, “so shall my children be free.” In these United States, even Caesar’s children pay the tax or use diverse to evade. Sovereign citizens, artificial citizens or foreigners are “made liable” for the tax via contract. Thee People do not require church exemption nor license to prosper.

Matthew 22:21, Yahuah-Shua said “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to Elohim what is Elohim’s.” The Pharisees were dumb struck, because they could not imagine that anyone would question what Caesar could not have, because anything he demanded was his.

The same “Roman lex” structure exists today. We are taxed on so many issues; we cannot discern the differences of what tribute are Caesar’s and of which we tithe Elohim. I think, we do not protest enough to know the difference, and our political character suffers the lash. Our generalship lacks knowledge and turns to frustration, worry and at times weaponry.

The W-4 is a simple contract of magnified proportion to the “natural born citizen.” The most important aspect of this and other like instruments is what makes them enforceable.

 

Uniform Commercial Code 3-104.(1), it must be a writing signed by the maker or drawer; The signing must be knowingly, willingly, intentionally and “unconditionally” given, at 3-104.2. What happens when you add a “condition” or covenant to agency?

Signing a W-4 draws the enforcement powers of Admiralty police power, because you waive your personam rights and are now domestic product, and “subject matter” only. Being subject to the “inferior” Article 1 courts; you may as well be a soldier, because the GI cannot reserve “in-personam” Rights and must stand at court martial and challenge subject matter only.

Black’s Law. Uniform Code. Many states have adopted the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and others have adopted acts substantially following the Uniform Code.

A state needs the code of Military Justice to obtain police powers. Article III Citizens are summoned by Thee People at probable cause. A policeman, sworn to do their duty to the subject Citizen, may upon proper Grand Jury indictment, bring you before Thee People.

Article II Executive Commander In Chief “executes” statute of Article I, which requires an “unconditional” contractual system that does not advocate due process in the structured and coordinated manner as the Constitution dictates for Citizens of Thee Bill of Rights.

The states are a “forum” government of the United States, which “makes” it a State or Territorial, “prize” of Admiralty and relies on the 14th Amendment for due process. The “forum” is attempting to erase all the state lines and consolidate Thee People for our “benefit” and/or protection.

The various Departments try you without resort to Tribunal because you have agreed by contract and Admiralty is the best Police Power the states can find for quick resolution of issues of reasonable cause. The burden of proof is on the citizen “of interest” via presumption of guilt and innocence must rebut or “dishonor” is issue.

The IRS, DMV, DEA, FBI, banks, schools, HMOs, ferret hunters, and municipalities are all “engrafted” to each other by the “Penumbra Doctrine,” which is Federalist “Public Policy.”

 

Agency may be estoppel, BUT the individual Sovereign Citizen, when applicable to them, must reserve rights or a “fair and impartial trial” may delict from your corporate neighbor as juror of false judgments.

The Admiralty courts are operated to administer subject matter jurisdiction only, because you waived in personam Rights via contract, “tacit” approval, or by “dishonoring” presentment. Bring up Sovereignty through the UC Codes and the “inferior court” of Article I must yield to Article III Judiciary for a trial of your “peers” based upon reasonable cause.

I have not filed an income tax return since 1978. There is no statute of limitations on non-filers. The IRS and the State of California followed my social security number until 1995. I paid more $500.00 frivolous fines than anyone I know because I signed under penalties of perjury without reserving rights.

I made an “unconditional” signing on a W-4, which “made liable” a “promise” as a corporation citizen. I wrote exempt and corporations cannot obtain such status; that is why I was fined. A “frivolous” signing took away my personam Rights and transferred them to the “subject matter” only jurisdiction of “sworn personnel” at in personam.

United States Citizens or “persons” are artificial citizens and agency does not know the difference until you explain it to them in their own language within the UC Code. Myriads of fact fighting, jurisdictional challenges and study material fell upon deaf ears. Property liens were filed in registrar’s offices in the hopes I would acquire property in the state “district” I was “residing.” Bank accounts were raided and property taken by the “implied power” of statute lex.

In 1991 I studied a few pages from the work of Howard Freeman on the Uniform Commercial Code. I started using the UCC to answer agency demands and began to understand why these “implied powers” had not put me in prison. I could not break Article I statute law until I dishonored their presentments or filed a return or perjured myself. I am an Article III citizen and I made the controversy a Separation of Powers issue.

 

 

I found that I did not waive rights when I signed agreements “without prejudice.” The only “implied” jurisdiction of agency had been presumptive and I “rebutted.” I did not have the proper key of knowledge to fit the political lock until I was successful. The W-4 was frivolous because there was no reservation of my personam rights as prima facie on the instrument that represented Article I with Article II forum procedure. Once I started answering the various agencies properly, they knew I was not domestic product or “subject to public policy” and left me alone, completely.

Agency hath no control over Propria Persona unless you waive by contract. The presentment notices stopped and I am exempt without even a thank you for clearing the matter. When my W-2 arrives, I sign my name to it and put “without prejudice” UCC 1-207 above my writing and send it certified mail to the agency. It is proclivity of your adversary not to answer and they did not and they cannot. My life is free from the worry and Yahuah-Shua is closer than he has ever been with his protective Grace. Thee best insurance you can get, and it’s free, with a lot of counsel prayer.

Black’s law 5th. False return. To constitute civil or criminal fraud under the Internal Revenue laws, such falsity must be intentional. Mitchell v. C.I.R., C.C.A.Ga., 118 F.2d 308.  Perjury is the beast of agency and the “promise” brings the executor to collect per contract. A reservation of Rights “vitiates” perjury and cannot “sustain a promise.”

UCC 3-104. it must contain an (2) unconditional; A soldier “must” contract unconditionally and waive in-personam because he is government “issue.” The politics of this act cannot be stressed enough, because We Thee People are victims of this same voluntary signing of contract. Make the instrument “conditional” and the power of enforcement is lost by agency, in the majority of issues.

A sovereign cannot be a soldier if he does not wish to sign his Rights away to the government. Agency activity cannot subjugate the non-corporate individual. An instrument made “conditional” does not comply with the enforcement or promise at UCC 3-104.3 and abates executor. The intended party must retain its enforceable status and character “unconditionally,” or the instrument is vitiated along with perjury.

 

Black’s. Commercial Law. An undertaking to pay and it must be more than an acknowledgment of an obligation. UCC 3-102.1[c].

It must be “unconditional” at the signing or agency cannot negotiate the instrument at issue. Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207, signed above your signature “will not sustain a promise” or an “appearance.” Without any of the above, enumerated sections of the UCC, the instrument is “dead in law.” Article I Legislative makes the statutes, which are then departmental at Article II Executive/Admiralty, which implements the codes. We the People are “entitled” to Article III judicial and must declare or loose the Bill of Rights.

Black’s. Law. A concurrent or joint resolution of legislature is not “a law,” Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707; Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; a resolution of the House of Representatives is not a “law,” State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165; an unconstitutional statute is not a “law,” Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248. That which must be obeyed and followed by citizens subject to sanctions or legal consequences is a law. Law is the will of the supreme power of the state. Calif. Civil Code 22.1.

Calif. Government Code 22.2, “The Common Law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution of the united States, or the Constitution or the laws of this state, is the rule of decision in all the courts of this state.” “All Laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. 137, 174, 176. “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 p. 491. “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S. “No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” 16 Am Jur 2d, 177, late Am Jur 2d 256.

The only citizens “subject” to statutes are those found within the “territory” of the 14th Amendment or municipalities contracted to that instrument. Thee Sovereign Citizen who contracts “unconditionally” with government activity are “unconscionably” seduced by the representing agency and must rebut or suffer unconscionable actions.

 

Black’s 5th pg. 1264, “Statutes are confined to their own territory, and have no extraterritorial effect.”

Article I Section 8 Clause 17 defines the jurisdiction of the statute “inferior courts” and “implied powers” of the Federal Government over artificial and contracted citizens of corporate status. We Thee People are “extraterritorial” within our separate state and agency must be may be abated with a non-assumpsit, voluntary signing.

“Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.” U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187.

A Sovereign Citizen cannot loose Rights, but you can waive them, or allow boards, municipalities and “corporate America” to vote them away. Look at any signing as a waiver of your most precious personal Rights and reserve them. Most “government activity” contracts are de facto and void of “benefit.” “Public Law” signs its Citizens au masse in hopes of obtaining the presumptive compliance from all citizens regardless of status.

Article I Section 2 Clause 3: “Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers.”

I will not bore you with excises, direct, imposts, duties or indirect tax procedures. The income tax is a graduated form of direct tax and de facto to the Sovereign state Citizen unless you are a good little volunteer and validate agency presumption by acquiescence to their jurisdiction “unconditionally” and “must be signed under penalty of perjury.”

The heart of the institution of taxing lies with the W-4 as a corporate negotiable “unit.” Your job application is agency’s first look at its new corporate for benefit citizen. You admit to being corporate by your social security number and the little box you checked asking if you are a U.S. Citizen. The only “benefit” is the insurance; a corporate property will not hire you without your being insured. From that point on, justice is blind, and Thee Citizen bears the presumptive burden of being mugged on payday and incorporated to his Lawful stand.

 

Prior to our signing our political lives away to domestic product and government activity, We Thee People were our own individual Sovereign entity. Congress puts together all activity the states use to subjugate its Sovereign Citizens to artificial culture and the President hires the Department heads.

The “Penumbra Doctrine” heads then put forth the myriads of codes and procedures, and we sign on to follow the “persons” ahead of us. The enrollment contracts we conduct our daily lives with are not unconstitutional because we voluntarily put our hand to the instruments. The units are cleverly worded as to their “forum” and seem innocent enough, which allows us to incorporate unconditionally at the time of the writing.

The above stated UCC 3-104 is for corporate use and adds “limited liability” to the natural person if we reserve our “personam.” Agency “situs” signed you up as an “artificial” U.S. Citizen found under the 14th Amendment due process. Open season on your Sovereignty is declared if you sign the document without reserving your Rights on the face of the instrument or W-4. This makes the unit “dead in law” for it vitiates the unit and is not then a promise with criminal connotations.

The code must be read in harmony with your Sovereign entity as intercede through Thee Bill of Rights under UCC 1-103.6. Persons born in Territories are not Sovereign Citizens, but U.S. Citizens. Hawaii is now a state under siege for its wealth, because agency is waiving the same forum contracts We Thee People signed before Hawaii became a state. Posterity is a moot issue without Sovereignty and Covenant.

We must pray for Thee People of Hawaii, I am certain they miss their Sovereignty the most for they are new at struggling without personam Covenant. If Puerto Rico could have Thee Knowledge of what a real state is like, they would not have voted down statehood. Puerto Rico is a Territory and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” the United States at Article I Section 8 Clause 17.

“Income taxes statutes apply only to state created creatures known as corporations no matter whether state, local, or federal.”, Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 421 US 100.

 

The Sovereign is free to contract as the spirit moves it. We must blend with the “wolf” to keep from having to fight him. To do this we must be as “wise as the serpent.” Reserving our Rights leaves the beast “as gentle as the dove,” because we do not have to occupy the cross and our generalship will provide Grace by relieving our worry.

“State created creatures” also walk, talk and sign unconscionable agreements without reserving their Rights. The state cannot give you the knowledge of their sovereignty, for it would mean their demise.

“The employer is not authorized to alter the form or to dishonor the employees claim.” The W-4 is automatic with its enumerated application per IRS Code 3402 (f) (3) and U.S. v. Malinowski, 347 F. Supp. 352.

If you do not exempt yourself properly, you will find out quickly who the boss wolf is and a $500 frivolous will follow without trial. Agency can only do that with help from Admiralty and the police power you created by an “unconditional” signing. No agent hath the power to change your reservation, because it would be a breach of contract and a violation of Thee Separate Powers, because “the IRS has no interest between the employee and the employer and the IRS has no interest in the circumstances of the action… and is not a party.” Stahoviak v. Denver and the RGW Railroad Co. # 79CV205, Rout County, Colorado. “There is no legal requirement to file a W-4 form.” U.S. v. John Freeman, 81-CR-112-U.S.D. Wisconsin.

The “affirmative defense” is not difficult to learn and will serve Thee People with political Liberties in their quest for the Bill of Rights promised within Thee Constitution of these united States of America.

The W-4 unit states; “Under penalties of perjury, I certify that I am entitled to the number of withholding allowances claimed on this certificate, or I am entitled to claim exempt status;” Employee’s signature; Form is not valid unless you sign it.”

Reserve your Rights, “Without Prejudice” UCC 1-207, above your signature becomes “prima facie” evidence that you are “express” in reserving your Rights. One of those Rights is the will to contract or not. Feel free to write EXEMPT in the square. A non-“assumpsit” cannot be “certified” as a contract or privilege license.

 

The IRS will tell you that you can claim more or less dependants, depending on how much you wish to pay into your “fund.” At the end of the filing period, you must claim the proper amount on your return or another penalty of perjury rears its ugly head. Sounds like a catch 22 to this Sovereign Citizen, and I will have none of it. The “fund” is their’s, and the burden of proof is on you under penalty of perjury if you wish to have any portion of the refund returned.

When rights are reserved prima facie, you will not suffer a penalty for agency would now be in violation of its own charter with the Executive. If you do file a return, RESERVE your rights, because you are “made liable” per statute. It would be interesting to see an agent dare audit an instrument that is non-negotiable, because perjury does not exist.

Black’s Law 5th. Certificate. A written assurance, or official representation, that some act has or has not been done, or some event occurred, or some legal formality has been complied with. A statement of some fact in a writing signed by the party certifying. A declaration in writing.

The form mentions the fact that you may claim exemption, but the argument is; if you are a corporation, you cannot file an exemption. Agency only knows what you tell them. So far, you have told them you are a corporate entity and “made liable” by statute. To be “entitled,” is where the serpent meets the Sovereign. Isn’t it nice of the IRS to give you the right to reclaim your money from your very own “fund?”

Black’s. Entitle. In its usual sense, to entitle is to give a right or legal title to. Schmidt v. Gibbons, 101 Ariz. 222, 418 P.2d 378, 380. To qualify for; to furnish with proper grounds for seeking or claiming. In ecclesiastical law, to entitle is to give a title or ordination as a minister.

The UCC prepares the way for the entitlement of exemption at agency via the W-4. I need no entitlement from human kind to teach Thee Law of Elohim, and Thee Truth and Grace of Yahuah-Shua Christ. With “reservation” the burden of proof is upon agency.

 

 

Black’s Entitlement. Right to benefits, income or property which may not be abridged without due process. IRS due process is nonexistent; this wolf is strictly Admiralty by contract and a “government activity” by definition. Presumptive agency activity is as avoidable as a self-inflicted hanging, if your rights are reserved. What more could We Thee People ask for?

There are two types of due process. The 5th Amendment, which keeps the Federal Government out of your liberty and the other, is the 14th Amendment, which protects Federal Statutes in regards to contracting state Sovereign citizens to its procedural due process. Give me Liberty or give me a way out of domestic subjectivity and We Thee People will prosper, so help us Elohim. The “forum” unit is not valid unless you sign “unconditionally.” There is no promise, assumpsit, obligation, or negotiable unit to cause an issue of perjury.

After the exemption, “Federal jurisdiction cannot be assumed, but must be clearly shown.” Brooks v. Yawkey 200 F. 2d. 633. ” The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.” Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533.

The escape clause at federal prosecution for Sovereign Citizens of the states is Rule 12. Defenses and Objections- (b) “…The following defenses may at the option of the pleader be made by motion: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. (2) lack of jurisdiction over the person. A motion making any of these defenses shall be made before pleading… (h) (3) “Whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action.”

Before pleading is the time to “answer” any inquiry of your adversary and to declare Propria Persona. Even a jury summons is a trap by asking you about hardship for non-compliance of jury duty. An answer gives jurisdiction to the agency because you give “tacit” approval to the tribunal so they may exercise their presumption of your cooperation. Do not feel threatened by these types of “summons;” the wolf is presumptively stalking for a stray. If you feel threatened, “without prejudice” UCC 1-207 will reserve your rights and point out several issues to agency that are very difficult to overcome.

Like the selective service and the IRS, they only know what you volunteer to them. The rest is none of their business. Only artificial Citizens may be “drafted” to do anything. Reserve all your Rights on any and every piece of correspondence that comes before you, if you are in a compromise situation where a signing is under duress.

“His [the attorney’s] first duty is to the court, not to the client, and wherever the duties he owes to the client conflict with the duties he owes to the court, as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter.” Corpus Juris Secundum, Attorney & Client, Sec. 4, pg 802.  Your lawyer will not explain his elliptical duty to you, for if he did you would have no part of him. When the Sovereign Citizen is exempt by code, the burden of proof reverts to agency to prove otherwise, for the presumption that the citizen is not exempt, has been rebutted.

The IRS and other agency’s make their living on presentments, which are “dishonored” by the Citizen. Lawyers are working under the same Article II procedure as the court; all have something to gain by your compliance and are not shy in asserting their contracted rights. Black’s. Presentment. Presentment is a demand for acceptance or payment made upon the maker, acceptor, drawee or other payor by or on behalf of the holder. UCC 3-504.1.

A contract usually exists before the Sovereign gets a presentment. A missed payment, court date or presumptive misunderstanding of intent may become actionable. If you did not knowingly, willingly and intentionally sign for the instrument, protect yourself with the code.

An unanswered presumption of owing money is as good as a contract if the citizen “dishonors” the sum demanded. Do not throw a presentment into the garbage where it belongs, for you “dishonor” the instrument by failing to rebut and the obligation will not be impaired.

Black’s law. Dishonor. To refuse to accept or pay a draft or to pay a promissory note when duly presented. An instrument is dishonored when a necessary or optional presentment is duly made and due acceptance or payment is refused, or cannot be obtained within the prescribed time, or in case of bank collections, the instrument is seasonably returned by the midnight deadline or presentment is excused and the instrument is not duly accepted or paid. UCC 3-507.1; 4-210.

 

All the holder needs to get you to their court is for you to disregard the bill or instrument. The court will see you have failed to answer or refuse to pay and give the creditor default to your pocketbook or garnishment. Always answer agencies, do not “fail to answer” their claims for this act alone will cause you worry. Give them only the reservation of Rights “virus;” nothing else is their business.

A state Citizen must force agency to use the mail, not the phone. You cannot build your “administrative record” with “parol” evidence. A dishonored claim is a presumptive admission of guilt, and that alone gives the presentment credibility in the eye of the “trier of fact.” Your answer or reservation of rights should be short, “without prejudice” UCC 1-207 will do nicely and will speak volumes to “public policy.” Return within 72 hours, via certified mail.

There are several answers a “vigilant” Citizen may use as study to presentments within these treatise, which I repeat again and on occasion, AGAIN, and least we forget, highlight all reservation of Rights phrases, an agent will test your knowledge. I think the Truth bears repeating.

UCC 1-207.9 states; “When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a loss of the right, and bars its assertion at a later date.”

More Truth; as soon as the opportunity arises for you to reserve your rights, DO IT even if you have doubts, because it is the best insurance you can get. I was an insurance agent once upon a time, but never sold a policy. I learned very quickly that the business would not make my family prosper for reasons I will not share. A presentment is as powerful from the insurance agency as it is from any IRS agent or a neighbor who presumes you owe money and makes a civil claim.

Answer every presumed debt as if you know what you are doing. If you do not owe money or wise agency to “verify,” the first presentment may be answered; “I hereby refute the validity of your unattested presentment/claim, without dishonor, I do not owe this money.” Sign, date, and write “without prejudice” UCC 1-207 on the face of the presentment demand, above your signature.

 

 

Affix a certified post number to the “prima facie,” which now becomes an evidence document for the trier of fact, and proves you are “express” in attempting to work out verification of the agency demand. Mail the demand to the agent via return receipt requested.

The individual agent is on “notice” that you are not waiving any rights and you want the instrument verified. The agent will then need to swear an oath that the presentment is a legitimate “true bill,” or find another fool who will commit perjury to do so. The Common Law does not sue out the entire state or agency, it becomes more personal and the agent must use great caution. The next presentment may be a request for confirmation of your “protest” or any other subterfuge indicating agency does not understand your demand.

The presentment may be from a different collection agency that has bought the supposed debt. The more third party intervention the better, because the weakness becomes more apparent and much harder to prove, because “the chain of evidence” is broken. The collectors are hoping you fold and start payment or refuse as a means of forcing you to dishonor so they can win by default. If the same agency persist, return the instrument with a copy of the above stated “without dishonor” statement and a UCC 3-505.

I have never had an agency answer this, not even an insurance agent or banker, and they are better trained at fleecing the Sovereign Citizen than the IRS. The Rights of Thee Sovereign Citizen can be violated by this conjecture. Agency activity is constructed very well and the individual sworn “person” must use caution, for ONLY now may your Rights be violated. You have notified an agent of your intent to protect yourself and require a “verified” instrument if one can be had.

Proclivity by the individual agent is the wise choice, for it is his hide that will hang in the patriot’s den if he does not have a true negotiable instrument. Many promotions are had by how quickly an agent can get a citizen to pay an unjust bill. If he does come up with a verified bill, work out a solution on better terms. A trial at the Common Law must be had to prove the fact that you owe anything over $20.00 and criminal intent must be proved.

 

 

Using the codes will give back due process of Thee Bill of Rights, instead of the due process of the 14th Amendment.

DO NOT ADD TO THIS COUNTER DEMAND.

UCC 3-505.4 Counter demands by party to whom presentment is made.
The party to whom presentment is made may, without dishonor, require:
[a] Exhibition of the instrument (creating the liability).
[b] Reasonable identification of the person making presentment and evidence of his authority to make it if made for another; and
[c] That the instrument be produced for acceptance or payment at a place specified in it, or if there be none, at any place reasonable in the circumstances; and
[d] A signed receipt of the instrument for any partial or full payment and its surrender on full payment.
Failure to comply with any such requirement invalidates the presentment, but the person presenting has a reasonable time in which to comply and the time for acceptance or payment runs from the time of compliance.

NOTICE: UCC 1-201(26)
From:
Domicile:
city:
Non-Domestic

CERTIFIED MAIL post#

Government Activity Agent: Restatement, Second, Agency {9}

At address:

I AM, an Article III, Preamble Citizen of the California Republic. Your “implied powers” instrument “note,” is not “assignable” or “negotiable” under UCC 3-104. I find this document Unconscionable UCC 2-302. I do not and will not accept, the liability associated with a “compelled” agreement of any unrevealed commercial benefit, or “Penumbra Doctrine” “engraft.”

 

 

My “conditional” “representation” is “without prejudice” UCC1-207 and is affirmed to the instrument herein as Exhibit “A”. Article III, at UCC 1-103.6, The Statute, being enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be construed in HARMONY with the COMMON LAW. No statute precludes this Citizen from seeking redress at the united States Supreme Court. In order to recover in federal court through [1983], plaintiff must show that a federal constitutional right was violated and the individual violating that constitutional right did so “under color of law.” 42 U.S.C.A 1983.

You have 30 days to answer the above-described Notice. UCC 1-201(10). If you have a right to assert, it is your duty to speak. Your “silence” is, “estoppel” in pais.

“without prejudice” UCC I-207

Citizen_____________________

About the Author

JamesView all posts by James

0 Comments

Add comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*